Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied service connection for colon cancer as there was no competent evidence linking the condition to the veteran's military service, including any exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The veteran's claim for service connection for anemia was denied, but the case is being remanded to obtain additional evidence.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2009
The veteran's appeal for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) was dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2009
The common law marriage between the veteran and the appellant is deemed valid, establishing the appellant as his surviving spouse for the purposes of VA benefits.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2009
The appeal was dismissed due to the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded to obtain a new VA examination and etiology opinion regarding the veteran's right inguinal hernia.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The case is remanded to gather records from the Daytona Beach VA Outpatient Clinic and to readjudicate the claim for reimbursement of medical expenses incurred at a private facility in June 2005.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for scheduling a Travel Board hearing.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's premature ventricular contractions, with chest pain, tremor, and twitches, were incurred in service. However, multiple lipomas are not shown to have been present in military service or for years thereafter, nor are they the result of any incident occurring during his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2009
The veteran was granted an effective date of June 13, 2001, for the grant of a total disability rating based on individual unemployability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied an earlier effective date for TDIU, finding that the evidence did not show unemployability due to service-connected disability prior to November 1, 1994.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for scheduling a new VA aid and attendance examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the veteran's death, as there was no evidence suggesting a link between colorectal cancer and military service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's cancer of the right tonsil region is causally related to his active duty service, including presumed exposure to Agent Orange during his time in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for additional development, including obtaining any informed consent records associated with the May 2000 cervical spine surgery.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The overpayment of VA nonservice-connected pension benefits in the amount of $130.80 was properly created.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's right eye disability has not been found to be more severe than a rating of 30 percent, and his left eye disorder is unrelated to service or his service-connected right eye condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The Board must remand the veteran's claims to the RO for further development and consideration due to insufficient competent medical evidence regarding the etiology of his leg length discrepancy and upper extremity condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran did not meet the duration requirements for a total disability rating under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, and there was no clear and unmistakable error in any prior decision that would have met these requirements.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected duodenal ulcer disability is being remanded for additional development.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.