Peripheral neuropathy Board decisions
38,945 indexed Board decisions for Peripheral neuropathy.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2015
The Veteran is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C. 1151 for additional disability resulting from VA surgical treatment in January 1986, which allegedly caused deformity and neuropathy of his left middle finger. The case is being remanded to obtain medical records, informed consent documents, and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2015
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus due to in-service herbicide exposure (Agent Orange) and secondary service-connected erectile dysfunction, diabetic neuropathy, and diabetic ulcers. The Veteran appealed this decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including VA examinations and a vocational assessment to determine the impact of his service-connected disabilities on his ability to work.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2015
The Board is remanding the case to consider whether an extra-schedular rating for the Veteran's service-connected residuals of a left wrist fracture should be granted, taking into account his multiple disabilities including hypertension and left ulnar neuropathy. The VA must also obtain any relevant SSA records and post-service treatment records.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2015
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable, and the Board finds that he is capable of sedentary labor.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2015
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for the issues of service connection for bilateral upper extremity peripheral neuropathy and an increased rating for his back disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · November 2015
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development.,The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations of his left knee disability and low back injury with paravertebral myositis remain pending before the Board as less than the maximum benefit available was granted in a previous decision.,The Veteran is seeking service connection for diabetes mellitus, which may be related to elevated blood sugar levels prior to separation from active service. Further development including VA examination and obtaining medical records are required.,The Veteran's claims for service connection of radiculopathy of the bilateral lower extremities, peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper extremities, and erectile dysfunction remain pending before the Board as less than the maximum benefit available was granted in a previous decision. Further development including VA examination is required.,The Veteran's claims for service connection of peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper extremities and erectile dysfunction are intertwined with his claim for diabetes mellitus. Further development including VA examination is required.,The Veteran's claims for service connection of radiculopathy of the bilateral lower extremities, peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper extremities, and erectile dysfunction remain pending before the Board as less than the maximum benefit available was granted in a previous decision. Further development including VA examination is required.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2015
The Board finds that the Veteran's currently diagnosed B-cell CLL and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities are not related to his active duty service, including exposure to Agent Orange. The evidence does not establish a link between these conditions and his military service.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2015
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death, and the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2015
The Board has determined that additional development is necessary to determine the nature and etiology of the appellant's claimed conditions, including whether they are related to his service in August 1976. The case will be remanded for further action.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2015
The Board found that the reduction of the Veteran's disability rating from 40% to noncompensable was improper and restored his original 40% rating. The Veteran's right elbow disability is currently rated at 40% under Diagnostic Code 8516 for paralysis of the ulnar nerve.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2015
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim for service connection for a bilateral knee condition. However, the Veteran's current knee and ankle conditions are not related to her active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2015
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the etiology of the Veteran's claimed conditions and whether they are related to service. The claims will be remanded for further action.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2015
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and development of his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II and bilateral peripheral neuropathy.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2015
The Veteran's appeal involves multiple conditions, including cervical and thoracolumbar spine disorders, knee and ankle injuries, a muscle disorder, diabetes mellitus due to herbicide exposure, multiple sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities, and an anxiety disorder. The claims are being remanded for additional development.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2015
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, is rated at 20 percent. The issue of service connection for a skin disability has been withdrawn by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2015
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not preclude him from securing and following a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2015
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of service connection or entitlement to higher ratings.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2015
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for all issues on appeal prior to the Board issuing a final decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination and referral to the Director of Compensation Service for extraschedular consideration.
← Back to Peripheral neuropathy overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.