Prostate cancer decisions — 2001
87 indexed Board decisions in 2001.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2001
The veteran's prostate cancer was not present in service or for many years later, and it is not related to an incident of service, including exposure to radiation. The Board finds that the preponderance of evidence is against the claim for service connection for prostate cancer.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2001
The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date of April 1, 2000 for the payment of additional compensation for his spouse has been granted. The effective date is set at February 1, 1997, which aligns with the date of a 100% rating for prostate cancer.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's right knee disorder and prostate cancer were not incurred or aggravated by service, and thus denied both claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The Board has denied the veteran's claim of service connection for prostate cancer due to a lack of evidence linking the condition to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected condition, and thus denied his claim for service connection for the cause of his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of encephalitis and prostate cancer, finding no current disabilities or medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The veteran's claim for a compensable rating for postoperative residuals of prostate cancer is denied as there are no current active or symptomatic residuals, including voiding dysfunction and erectile dysfunction.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance or being housebound was denied because he does not meet the criteria for such benefits, as his disabilities do not render him unable to care for his daily personal needs without assistance from others.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's prostate cancer is not related to his exposure to ionizing radiation during service, and thus denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2001
The veteran's application for RH insurance was denied because it was not received within two years of receiving notice of service connection for disability. The AOJ also determined that the veteran would be precluded from meeting the underwriting standards of good health due to his various nonservice-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2001
The veteran's service-connected disabilities are sufficient to render him unemployable without regard to his age and any non-service-connected disorders.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2001
The veteran is seeking compensation under the Veterans' Claims Assistance Act of 2000 for prostate cancer, which he claims was caused by VA medical care. The Board has ordered additional development to determine if VA carelessness or negligence contributed to his condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2001
The case is being remanded due to the need for additional development of evidence related to service connection for the cause of the veteran's death, including potential exposure to Agent Orange during Vietnam service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2001
The veteran's prostate cancer is granted service connection as secondary to herbicide exposure, specifically Gulf War Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2001
The veteran is seeking service connection for prostate cancer that he believes was caused by his exposure to Agent Orange during his military service. The VA has not reviewed all of the relevant medical records, including those from the Erie and Cleveland VA Medical Centers, which may be pertinent to his claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2001
The VA determined that the veteran's residuals of prostate cancer, manifested by urinary frequency and leakage requiring absorbent materials changed more than twice a day, warranted a 40 percent disability evaluation.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2001
The Board has granted service connection for residuals of prostate cancer, including status post radical retropubic prostatectomy due to Agent Orange exposure but denied a compensable disability evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2001
The veteran's claims for service connection for various disabilities, including prostate cancer and skin disability, were denied as the evidence did not support a finding that these conditions are related to his military service or exposure to Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2001
The Board has granted a 20 percent evaluation for residuals of a fracture of the left ankle since October 27, 1995. The veteran's service-connected conditions have been evaluated based on their specific diagnostic codes in the VA Rating Schedule.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a temporary total post-surgical convalescent rating and an increased rating for his service-connected chronic prostatitis with urethral stricture, finding that the prostate surgery was not related to his service-connected condition.
← Back to Prostate cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.