Prostate cancer decisions — 2001
87 indexed Board decisions in 2001.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2001
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and found that the veteran's current hearing disability is related to his military service. The claims for prostate cancer, lung cancer, and a compensable rating for right shoulder tendinitis are remanded due to insufficient evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 60 percent for postoperative prostate cancer and found that his entitlement to special monthly compensation (SMC) under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1114(s) was properly terminated.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2001
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus, as well as his request to reopen a claim for diabetes mellitus. The RO is instructed to attempt alternative searches for the veteran's service medical records and provide an opinion from a specialist in oncology regarding the primary site of the veteran's cancer.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected condition, and therefore denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death to establish entitlement to burial benefits.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedFebruary 2001
The Board is unclear about the reasons for the previous denials and whether new evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim. The veteran's prostate disorder may be related to his service, but further examination and development are needed.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2001
The RO granted a 40 percent rating for prostate cancer and a noncompensable rating for erectile dysfunction, effective October 15, 1998. The veteran's claim for higher ratings remains pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer due to Agent Orange exposure, increased evaluations for duodenal ulcer with transthoracic vagotomy and ventral hernia, incisional, post operative, and a total rating for compensation purposes based on individual unemployability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2001
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to a change in the law and the need for additional development of his claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's loss of erectile power, secondary to prostate cancer, does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under the applicable VA disability evaluation guidelines.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · February 2001
The Board denied restoration of a 100% disability evaluation for prostate cancer and denied entitlement to higher evaluation, finding that the evidence did not warrant such ratings.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2001
The veteran's claims for right ear hearing loss, refractive error, muscle cramps of the feet and chest pains, difficulty falling asleep, history of prostate cancer, duodenal ulcer, and dizziness/vertigo (claimed as vestibular neuritis) were all denied. The service connection was granted only for left ear hearing loss.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2001
The veteran's prostate cancer residuals, including impotence and excoriated skin overlying the scrotum and penis, are rated at 60 percent. The initial compensable rating for impotence is granted, while the excoriated skin condition does not warrant a compensable rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2001
The Board denied an increased rating for the veteran's prostate condition, finding that his symptoms did not warrant a higher than 20 percent evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2001
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and conducting examinations to assess the veteran's service-connected disabilities and their impact on his ability to work.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2001
The Board has determined that the reduction of the veteran's prostate cancer rating from 100% to 40% was proper. The PTSD claim is granted, with a 50% disability rating assigned.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for skin cancer and prostate cancer, finding that there was no evidence to support these conditions. The claim for PTSD was also denied as the preponderance of the evidence showed that the veteran did not have PTSD.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2001
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete development of evidence regarding radiation exposure and dose assessment. The veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer and colon cancer are pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · January 2001
The Board denied a rating in excess of 60 percent for prostate cancer, status post irradiation. The issue of whether new and material evidence has been submitted to re-open the claim for service connection for the residuals of a left eye injury was also remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2001
The veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of medical expenses incurred at Fletcher Allen Health Care from April 8 to 11, 1998 is denied as the prostate cancer was not a service-connected disability at that time.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2001
The veteran's PTSD is rated at 70% due to substantial social and occupational impairment. The prostate cancer rating has been reduced from 100% to 20%, but the veteran appeals for restoration of the 100% rating. The voiding dysfunction issue remains in appellate status.
← Back to Prostate cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.