Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
46 vetted Board decisions in 2003.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a compensable evaluation for sarcoidosis and entitlement to a compensable rating based on multiple service-connected disabilities under 38 C.F.R. § 3.324, finding that his sarcoidosis did not interfere with normal employability.
The veteran withdrew his appeal for all pending issues prior to the Board's decision.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for hypertension and sarcoidosis, finding that the evidence did not warrant higher ratings under the applicable criteria.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for open angle glaucoma and bilateral arm weakness as secondary to his service-connected sarcoidosis, and denied an increased rating for generalized sarcoidosis.
The Board found that the veteran did not have a chronic respiratory disorder during service and there was no evidence of asbestos or Agent Orange exposure. The current respiratory disorders are not etiologically related to any injury or disease in service.
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for a duodenal ulcer and inactive pulmonary sarcoidosis were denied as the evidence did not reveal good cause for his failure to appear for VA examinations.
The Board denied the veteran's request to reopen his claim for service connection for sarcoidosis, including as a result of exposure to Agent Orange, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted.
The veteran's sarcoidosis has been evaluated at a 30 percent rating since February 20, 1996. The Board finds that his current condition warrants an increase to a 60 percent evaluation due to persistent symptoms requiring chronic low dose corticosteroids.
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has determined that the veteran's bilateral glaucoma is a result of treatment received during service for his service-connected chronic sarcoidosis with iridocyclitis, and thus grants service connection for this disability.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to his request for a videoconference hearing before the Board.
The Board has determined that the veteran's sarcoidosis with inactive pulmonary tuberculosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease does not meet the criteria for a disability rating higher than the currently assigned 60 percent.
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension and a 30 percent rating for sarcoidosis, based on the evidence of record. The appellant's failure to report for VA examinations prevented further evaluation.
The veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder is granted on a secondary basis due to his service-connected sarcoidosis. However, the initial rating for sarcoidosis from February 15, 1992 to June 9, 1997 and any evaluation in excess of 30 percent after June 10, 1997 are denied.
The Board has determined that the veteran's sarcoidosis is related to his active service, and thus grants entitlement to service connection for this condition.
The Board found that the veteran's sarcoidosis was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and denied his claim.
The veteran's service-connected residuals of sarcoidosis were found to not warrant a rating in excess of 10 percent prior to January 24, 2000 and on or after January 24, 2000.
The VA denied an increased rating for the veteran's service-connected hilar sarcoidosis, finding that the condition primarily manifested as symptomatic sarcoidosis with pulmonary fibrosis and moderate dyspnea on extended exertion. The current criteria did not warrant a higher rating.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and SMC based on his service-connected conditions, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for higher evaluations under the applicable rating criteria.
The veteran's appeals for increased ratings and earlier effective dates have not been perfected due to the failure to file a timely substantive appeal.
The VA determined that the appellant's pulmonary sarcoidosis did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation prior to June 30, 2000.
← Back to Sarcoidosis overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.