Sarcoidosis decisions — 2008
63 indexed Board decisions in 2008.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2008
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and for a VA examination. The veteran's claim for service connection for sarcoidosis is pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2008
The Board has granted service connection for radiculopathy, left lower extremity with an effective date of May 10, 2007. The other issues on appeal are pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2008
The veteran is seeking service connection for sarcoidosis. The case has been remanded due to the need to obtain missing service medical records and VA treatment records, as well as a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2008
The veteran's claims for service connection and non-service connected pension have been remanded due to scheduling issues.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2008
Service connection granted for joint pain, muscle pain, and sarcoidosis related to service in the Gulf War. Effective date not specified.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2008
The Board has determined that further development is needed to determine if the veteran's current sarcoidosis is related to his military service. The case will be returned for this purpose.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2008
The veteran is seeking service connection for panic disorder, which he contends is secondary to his service-connected pulmonary sarcoidosis. The Board has determined that further examination and opinion are needed to clarify the relationship between these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claim for a total rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities, as his combined disability evaluation is 60 percent and he does not meet the schedular criteria for consideration of a TDIU.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2008
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining employment records and verifying in-service exposure to asbestos. The veteran's uveitis, neurosarcoidosis with myelopathy and optic nerve involvement, and anemia are being evaluated based on their relationship to service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2008
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination to assess his employability due to service-connected disabilities and an increased rating for sarcoidosis. The total disability claim will be reconsidered based on the new evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2008
The veteran's sarcoidosis and neck mass have been granted service connection, with the Board finding that these conditions are related to her active military service.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2008
The veteran withdrew his appeal for service connection of bilateral hearing loss. The case remains pending for the issue of service connection for sarcoidosis, which is addressed in a separate REMAND.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2008
The veteran's appeal has been withdrawn, and the case is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2008
The Board has ordered further development due to the need for clarification of a previous opinion and the need for VA examinations to determine the current nature and likely etiology of the veteran's lumbosacral spine disorder and lung disease.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2008
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including examinations and readjudication of the veteran's TDIU claim. The AOJ should provide the veteran with appropriate examinations to determine the effect his service-connected disabilities have on his ability to work.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his bilateral leg edema associated with sarcoidosis and for sarcoidosis itself, finding that the current disability ratings adequately reflect the severity of these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations and effective dates for his service-connected disabilities, including right eye retinitis/sarcoid uveitis, pes planus, and a scar in the area of the right forehead.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2008
The Board found that the veteran does not have residuals of a left ankle fracture related to active service and denied his claim for service connection. The issue of sarcoidosis is addressed in the REMAND portion.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2008
The Board denied the veteran's request to reopen his claim for service connection for sarcoidosis, finding no new and material evidence had been submitted.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · September 2008
The Board found that the veteran's sarcoidosis was not incurred in or aggravated during service and may not be presumed to have been so incurred due to exposure to herbicides. The claim for service connection is denied.
← Back to Sarcoidosis overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.