Sarcoidosis decisions — 2010
84 indexed Board decisions in 2010.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's sarcoidosis was present to a compensable degree within the first year after his discharge from service, and therefore is presumed to have been incurred in or aggravated by active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board found no evidence of the claimed conditions during active service and denied all claims for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to unclear residuals of his service-connected non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and the need for additional VA examinations.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2010
The Board granted a 60 percent disability rating for sarcoidosis with pulmonary fibrosis and hilar adenopathy since November 19, 2004. The Veteran's sarcoidosis has manifested by pulmonary involvement requiring systemic high dose (therapeutic) corticosteroids for control.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for sarcoidosis, hypertension, and chronic renal failure. The Veteran was not shown to have a current sarcoidosis disability, and his statements about the onset of hypertension were found to be inconsistent with medical evidence. Chronic renal failure was determined to be caused by uncontrolled hypertension or hypertensive nephrosclerosis, which is not related to service.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2010
The Veteran has withdrawn her appeals on the issues of increased evaluations for her service-connected major depressive disorder, sarcoidosis with asthma, migraine headaches and hypertension; as well as entitlement to service connection for sinusitis.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Veteran's claim for a clothing allowance is denied because he does not have a service-connected disability that requires the use of a prosthetic or orthopedic appliance, nor one requiring medication for irreparable damage to his outer garments.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Veteran seeks service connection for sarcoidosis, which he contends is due to exposure to Agent Orange while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. The RO denied this claim as sarcoidosis is not among the diseases or disorders eligible for presumptive service connection based on herbicide agent exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to inadequate examination reports and the need for additional medical evidence. The claim will be reconsidered after these requirements are met.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected condition, and the Board denied both DIC benefits and dependency and indemnity compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for Boeck's sarcoidosis, currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling, was denied by the Board. The evidence did not support a higher evaluation in excess of 10 percent under applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2010
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including pulmonary and cutaneous sarcoidosis, hypertension, diabetes insipidus, and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, render him unable to obtain and maintain any form of substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's sarcoidosis first manifested within one year of his discharge from service and is therefore presumed to be related to his military service. The claim for service connection for sarcoidosis is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that noise exposure during reserve duty more likely contributed to these conditions. The claim for sarcoidosis was denied as there is no evidence of current disability or in-service occurrence. The eye disorder claim is pending.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJuly 2010
The Veteran's claims for respiratory disorders, low back disorder, and PTSD have been previously denied. New evidence has not raised a reasonable possibility of substantiating these claims.,The Veteran's right foot and heel disorders were not incurred in or aggravated by active service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to inadequate examination and missing treatment records, as well as the need for a hearing on her sarcoidosis claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's sarcoidosis was not incurred in or aggravated by his active service and denied the claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for sarcoidosis is being remanded due to the unavailability of his service treatment records and the need for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's lung disabilities, including emphysema and sarcoidosis, were not incurred in or aggravated by active service. The Board found that the most probative evidence does not support a finding of direct service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The July 2003 rating decision denied service connection for sarcoidosis, finding that it was not a presumptive disease and the evidence did not establish a direct nexus to service. The Veteran's claim is now being reopened based on new evidence.
← Back to Sarcoidosis overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.