Sarcoidosis Board decisions
2,396 indexed Board decisions for Sarcoidosis.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2004
The Board found no evidence linking the veteran's current chronic lung condition, sarcoidosis to his period of active service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2004
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination and clarification of his Social Security Administration (SSA) disability benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for various service-connected disabilities, including low back pain with degenerative arthritis, arthritis of the right knee, medial collateral ligament strain of the left knee, residuals of resection of the left clavicle, residuals of a left lung resection with history of sarcoidosis, duodenal ulcer, and hemorrhoids.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2004
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including a VA examination and issuance of a Statement of the Case on the issues of earlier effective date for diabetes type II and initial disability evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for multiple joint arthritis, an increased rating for sarcoidosis, and an increased rating for healed fracture, right ankle. The evidence did not support a finding that the veteran suffered from these conditions or that they were related to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2004
The Board has determined that the veteran's sarcoidosis, when evaluated based on pre-October 7, 1996 criteria, did not warrant a compensable rating. The claim for hypertension was denied as there is no evidence linking it to service. Right leg shortening was also denied due to lack of medical support and its presumed congenital nature.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2004
The Board has granted service connection for sarcoidosis/interstitial lung disease, finding that it is related to the veteran's period of active duty service. The other issues on appeal are deferred and will be addressed upon completion of additional development.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for asthma, sarcoidosis, and bronchitis, as well as her claim for an increased rating for sinusitis. The veteran was granted a 10 percent rating for chronic pansinusitis under the criteria in effect prior to October 7, 1996.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedFebruary 2004
The Board has reopened the veteran's claims of service connection for sarcoidosis, right medial collateral ligament strain, and prostate disorder. The appeal is remanded to obtain additional VA treatment records and determine whether new stressors occurred during service.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2004
The Board has granted service connection for post-operative left spermatocele residuals and remanded the issues of initial evaluations for sarcoidosis, pseudofolliculitis barbae, dermatofibromas of the legs, and gastroesophageal reflux disease.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection due to sarcoidosis with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, finding that the earliest possible effective date is April 15, 1999.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2004
The veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection for various conditions related to his active service were denied. The Board found that the veteran did not have any of these conditions during or within one year after his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2004
The Board granted the veteran's claim for service connection for sarcoidosis and awarded a 100% evaluation for hypertension. The other issues were either withdrawn or dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2004
The Board has ordered further development due to pending issues regarding the veteran's claim for service connection of sarcoidosis. The case is now being sent back to the RO for additional evidence and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2003
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to inadequate evaluation of the veteran's claims, including obtaining treatment records and providing VA examinations.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for sarcoidosis, avascular necrosis of the left hip, and hypertension as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The Board found no evidence linking these conditions to Agent Orange exposure or active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for sarcoidosis, finding that it was not incurred or aggravated during active duty and could not be presumed due to its absence within one year of discharge.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has ordered further development in the veteran's case due to pending issues regarding service connection for sarcoidosis of the brain and diabetes mellitus. The appeal is currently remanded for additional evidence collection and examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board previously denied the appellant's claim for service connection for sarcoidosis for the purpose of accrued benefits. The Court has ordered a remand due to failure to meet VCAA requirements.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2003
The veteran's claim for an increased disability rating for service-connected sarcoidosis is being remanded due to the need for proper application of the correct diagnostic code and potential VCAA notification issues.
← Back to Sarcoidosis overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.