Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
28,414 vetted Board decisions for Scars.
The Board found that the veteran's arthritis of multiple joints is not service-connected and denied his claim. The initial compensable disability rating for residual scars from shrapnel wounds to the right lower extremity was also denied.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and an increased evaluation for his left thoracic sympathectomy scar, finding that there was no evidence of a relationship between these conditions and service. The Board also found that the current evaluations were appropriate given the lack of functional impairment attributable to the scars.
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected conditions have been denied. The RO found that the current evaluations were appropriate and did not meet the criteria for higher ratings.
The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen her claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death, finding that no new and material evidence had been presented since the previous denial in December 1991.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased disability ratings for service-connected tinnitus and postoperative cyst of the anal region with scarring due to his failure to report for a scheduled VA examination.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected disabilities do not preclude him from securing and following substantially gainful employment, as his combined rating is at least 70% but does not meet the criteria for TDIU.
The veteran's claims for initial compensable evaluations for his right middle finger and left forearm scars, as well as his claim for service connection for a left knee disability, were denied by the RO. The Board found no evidence to support higher ratings under any applicable rating criteria.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for scars of the right thigh, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the current status of his service-connected scars.
The veteran's scar of the left eyebrow is granted as it was directly incurred during service. The veteran's residuals of a head injury and low back disability are denied as they were not incurred in service.
The Board has determined that there is no legal entitlement to an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for scars of the left hand, as the veteran did not file a formal or informal claim prior to March 21, 2003.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for shrapnel fragment wound (SFW) residuals, left hip; a rating in excess of 10 percent for SFW residuals, left groin; and compensable ratings for SFW scar residuals, right thigh, right mid foot, and left deltoid region.
The veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable due to their severity, as his educational and occupational background allow for substantially gainful employment.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a right ankle disability and entitlement to an increased rating for his gunshot wound scar of the lower right leg. The evidence does not support a current right ankle disability or any impairment due to the veteran's service-connected gunshot wound scar.
The veteran withdrew his claims for higher ratings, and the appeal is dismissed without prejudice.
The veteran is seeking compensation under the 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional disabilities, including abdominal scarring, stomach problems, hernia, and left-sided nerve damage, which he claims are due to VA treatment of his Crohn's disease. The case needs further examination and review by a medical professional.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a compensable initial disability rating for residual scars of a splenectomy and an earlier effective date for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for residuals of a splenectomy.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete records and need for further medical examinations.
The Board denied the claims for increased ratings and earlier effective date, finding that the appellant's service-connected scars did not warrant a rating in excess of 10% or an effective date prior to April 4, 2002.
The Board granted service connection for bilateral pes planus and assigned an initial noncompensable rating for the scar of the left arm. The veteran's current symptoms, including pain, were considered in determining the appropriate disability ratings.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for various conditions, including diabetes mellitus, left ear hearing loss, hiatal hernia with Barrett's esophagus, and facial and neck scarring. The preponderance of evidence did not support higher ratings under VA rating criteria.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.