The veteran withdrew his claims for higher ratings, and the appeal is dismissed without prejudice.
The deciding factor: The veteran submitted a written statement withdrawing his claims prior to their decision.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a right fibula fracture, left facial scar, paresthesia of the left zygomatic area, shrapnel wound of the left knee with retained bodies
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 6, 2006
- Citation
- 0606360
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,020 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0606360.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for residuals of a right fibula fracture, leg length discrepancy secondary to left total knee replacement, and left ankle condition secondary to left total knee replacement due to incomplete examination reports and need for further clarification on etiology.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that the VA examination of the Veteran's ankle was inadequate and remanded for a new examination. The case is being returned to the AOJ for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination findings for assessing the current severity of the Veteran's service-connected residuals of a right fibula fracture. The Veteran needs an updated VA examination to determine his current disability level.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination of the Veteran's ankle and lower leg, which is necessary for a proper evaluation of his service-connected residuals of a right fibula fracture.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.