Wrist & hand decisions — 2006
482 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The Board denied increased ratings for the veteran's cervical spine injury, left knee synovitis with chondromalacia, and right wrist injury.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The veteran's claims for service connection and increased evaluations were denied. The Board found no evidence of in-service injury or disease that would support these claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The veteran's claim for TDIU was denied in July 1992 due to lack of evidence showing an increase in disability during the one year period preceding March 22, 2003. The RO found that no new and material evidence had been submitted.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased initial ratings for his right wrist disability and scar, finding that the evidence did not warrant a higher rating under applicable VA regulations.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The veteran's right wrist disability, currently rated at 10 percent under DC 5215 for limitation of motion, does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation as his dorsiflexion is greater than 15 degrees and palmar flexion is not limited in line with his forearm.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The veteran's skin rash and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome were not found to be related to his military service. The claims for asthma, hypertension, arthritis, and tinea pedis were all denied as new evidence did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2006
The veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for scheduling a Travel Board hearing at the RO and sending notice of the hearing to his current address.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedOctober 2006
The Board found new and material evidence to reopen the claim of service connection for a left ankle disorder. However, there is no established chronic left wrist disorder in service or currently diagnosed.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · October 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed conditions are related to his service, and granted service connection for most of the disabilities listed. The effective date is not specified.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2006
The veteran's arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease is rated at 60 percent, and his right wrist disability is rated at 10 percent. The higher ratings are granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2006
The veteran's claims for service connection for a low back disability and an increased rating for his right wrist disability are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and opinions.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The Board has denied all claims for service connection and a higher initial rating for hypertension, as well as the denial of increased ratings for other conditions. The appellant did not meet the criteria for any of these claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral inguinal hernias, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and a lumbar condition due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for left ear hearing loss and residuals of a left wrist injury, finding that there is no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2006
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining a medical examination to evaluate the nature and etiology of the claimed right and left knee disabilities and right wrist disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The Board found that the veteran's right wrist and hand disability did not result from disease or injury incurred in or aggravated during active military service, as his pre-existing condition did not undergo any worsening beyond natural progression.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2006
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and employment information. The case will be reviewed again after the development is completed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2006
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to address the extent of his knee and wrist disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional medical examinations and review of records.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2006
The Board denied increased evaluations for the veteran's right knee and left wrist disabilities, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for higher ratings under VA rating criteria.
← Back to Wrist & hand overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.