The veteran's cerebrovascular accident and its residuals are not service-connected, as the medical evidence does not support a link between his VA-prescribed medications and the stroke.
The deciding factor: The medical opinions provided do not establish a causal relationship between the veteran's prescribed medication and his cerebrovascular accident or its residuals.
- Claimed conditions
- Cerebrovascular Accident
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 26, 2001
- Citation
- 0119432
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0119432.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that there was a duty to assist error regarding the Veteran's treatment on August 9 and 10, 2012. The case is being remanded for further examination and opinion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to outstanding VA treatment records for the period since August 11, 2017. The Veteran's service-connected PTSD and cerebrovascular accident are being reviewed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted a 100% rating for cerebrovascular accident from June 12, 2011 to December 31, 2011. The issue of service connection for left eye visual problem as a residual of cerebrovascular accident is remanded. A compensable rating for residuals of thoracotomy scar is also remanded.
- Denied
The Board denied reopening of the claims for service connection for various conditions, including nicotine dependence, coronary artery disease, neuropathy of the legs, loss of vision in the left eye, cataracts, atrial fibrillation, obesity, cerebrovascular accident, diabetes mellitus, porokeratosis, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The Board found that new evidence did not establish a relationship to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.