Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The veteran's claims for service connection for hearing loss and PTSD are being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations.,The veteran's claim for service connection for a skin rash (rephrased as 'jungle rot') is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations. The examiner should determine if it is at least as likely not that the condition is related to service or exposure to Agent Orange.,The veteran's claim for service connection for glaucoma is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations. If both type 2 diabetes and glaucoma are diagnosed, the examiners should consider the relationship between them and render an opinion as to whether it is at least as likely as not that any diagnosed glaucoma is related to diabetes mellitus.,The veteran's claim for increased evaluation of PTSD remains on appeal.

The deciding factor: Additional medical examinations are needed to determine if the veteran currently has a hearing loss disability, a skin rash (rephrased as 'jungle rot'), or glaucoma. The examiner should also consider whether any diagnosed conditions are related to service or exposure to Agent Orange.,The veteran's claim for service connection for a skin rash is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations. The examiner should determine if it is at least as likely not that the condition is related to service or exposure to Agent Orange.,The veteran's claim for service connection for glaucoma is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations. If both type 2 diabetes and glaucoma are diagnosed, the examiners should consider the relationship between them and render an opinion as to whether it is at least as likely as not that any diagnosed glaucoma is related to diabetes mellitus.,The veteran's claim for increased evaluation of PTSD remains on appeal.

Claimed conditions
hearing loss disability, skin rash, glaucoma
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 4, 2001
Citation
0124077

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0124077.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.