The veteran's disabilities are evaluated as follows: severe saphenous vein insufficiency, severe peripheral vascular insufficiency, history of superficial vein thrombosis and nocturnal leg cramps, left lower extremity; severe peripheral vascular insufficiency, popliteal, history of thrombophlebitis, nocturnal leg cramps, right lower extremity. The combined evaluation is 40 percent. The veteran does not have a single disability rated at 100 percent and the evidence does not show that he is substantially confined to his dwelling or immediate premises.
The deciding factor: The veteran's disabilities are evaluated as follows: severe saphenous vein insufficiency, severe peripheral vascular insufficiency, history of superficial vein thrombosis and nocturnal leg cramps, left lower extremity; severe peripheral vascular insufficiency, popliteal, history of thrombophlebitis, nocturnal leg cramps, right lower extremity. The combined evaluation is 40 percent. The veteran does not have a single disability rated at 100 percent and the evidence does not show that he is substantially confined to his dwelling or immediate premises.
- Claimed conditions
- severe saphenous vein insufficiency, severe peripheral vascular insufficiency (left lower extremity), superficial vein thrombosis, nocturnal leg cramps, history of superficial vein thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, lung emboli, duodenal ulcer disease, carcinoma of the prostate (status post radiotherapy), right groin herniorrhaphy, removal of a carbuncle from the right groin, sensorineural hearing loss
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- December 17, 2003
- Citation
- 0335517
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0335517.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection of phlebitis and thrombophlebitis, secondary to residuals of pericarditis, due to a lack of compliance with previous remand instructions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for an etiological opinion regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected sensorineural hearing loss was a contributory cause of death.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeals for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea and sensorineural hearing loss due to untimely notice of disagreement, while remanding the claim for hypertension for further development.
- Partly granted
The appeal was denied for an increased rating of tinnitus and remanded for further development on other service connection claims.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.