The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for a back disorder. The veteran's disability manifested by lumbosacral facet syndrome is due to disease or injury incurred in active service, while damage to cutaneous innervation of midposterior thoracic area is also likely due to an injury in active service.
The deciding factor: The evidence submitted since the last final denial supports a finding that the veteran's current back disability is related to his military service.
- Claimed conditions
- neuropsychiatric disorder, lumbosacral facet syndrome, damage to cutaneous innervation of midposterior thoracic area
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 22, 2004
- Citation
- 0426162
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0426162.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for an SOC addressing service connection for a neuropsychiatric disorder secondary to a back condition.
- Partly granted
The Board granted readjudication for several conditions due to new and relevant evidence. Some claims were denied, and others were remanded for further review.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence regarding new and material evidence. The issues of entitlement to service connection have been reopened, but further development is needed before a final decision can be made.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining a VA examination to determine if any neuropsychiatric disorders are related to service and whether they were aggravated by service. The Veteran's claims will be readjudicated after this development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.