The Board granted readjudication for several conditions due to new and relevant evidence. Some claims were denied, and others were remanded for further review.

The deciding factor: The decision was based on the presentation of new and relevant evidence that warranted readjudication.

Claimed conditions

hypertension, diabetes mellitus, type II, erectile dysfunction, flat feet, left hip replacement pending, right shoulder disability, left knee disability, neuropsychiatric disorder, nose disability, refractive error and astigmatism, rheumatoid arthritis of the neck, bilateral arms, and bilateral shoulders, right arm pain disability, right hip osteoarthritis with right hip replacement, right side shoulder pain disability, bilateral hearing loss disability

How they argued it

Reopened with new and material evidence

Exposure basis

None

Rating assigned

None in this decision

Decision date

January 21, 2025

Citation

A25005110

Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine