The VA determined that the veteran's claimed residuals of a fracture of the left little finger were not incurred or aggravated by active service and may not be presumed to have been so incurred.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show any injury or complaint related to the left little finger during active service, and no chronic condition was shown in service. The veteran's history of the injury is inconsistent with his service records.
- Claimed conditions
- fracture of the left little finger
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 25, 2004
- Citation
- 0429241
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0429241.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's mild atrophy of left thigh quadriceps muscle group XIV is currently rated as 40 percent disabling, which is the maximum schedular rating available.,For asthma prior to February 18, 2018, a higher rating of 30 percent is not warranted. For asthma effective February 18, 2018, a higher rating of 60 percent is not warranted.,The Veteran's acne does not meet the criteria for a higher than 10 percent rating.,For ulcer syndrome with pancreatitis effective January 27, 2010, a higher than 30 percent rating is not warranted.,Left shoulder and right shoulder disabilities are remanded for further evaluation.
- Denied
The Veteran's residuals of an in-service fracture of the left little finger have been manifested by pain, loss of range of motion, weakness, and deformity. However, he still retains functional use of his left little finger and there are no objective neurological manifestations of this disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA examinations and further examination is required. The Veteran's service-connected disabilities are being evaluated for their impact on his need for aid and attendance or housebound status.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance is being remanded due to the need for further development, including a VA examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.