The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to properly evaluate the appellant's right leg nerve disability, and thus remands the case for further development.
The deciding factor: Additional medical evidence is necessary to determine the current status of the appellant's service-connected right leg nerve disability.
- Claimed conditions
- right lower leg neuropathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 12, 2005
- Citation
- 0500873
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,458 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0500873.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, right hand neuropathy, left hand neuropathy, right lower leg neuropathy, and left lower leg neuropathy as they are not shown to be related to military service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal involves multiple service-connected disabilities, including depression, diabetes mellitus with nephropathy and erectile dysfunction, left lower leg neuropathy, and right lower leg neuropathy. The issues are about increased ratings for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a VA examination to assess all residuals of the veteran's shell fragment wound. The issues on appeal are an increased rating for right lower leg neuropathy and an increased rating for injury to muscle group XI.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his right lower leg neuropathy, currently evaluated as 20 percent disabling.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.