The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a VA examination to assess all residuals of the veteran's shell fragment wound. The issues on appeal are an increased rating for right lower leg neuropathy and an increased rating for injury to muscle group XI.
The deciding factor: The joint motion agreed that the veteran should be afforded another VA examination to determine the extent of all disabilities resulting from his shell fragment wound, including nerve damage and muscle damage.
- Claimed conditions
- right lower leg neuropathy, injury to muscle group XI
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 15, 2007
- Citation
- 0736012
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0736012.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, right hand neuropathy, left hand neuropathy, right lower leg neuropathy, and left lower leg neuropathy as they are not shown to be related to military service or herbicide exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal involves multiple service-connected disabilities, including depression, diabetes mellitus with nephropathy and erectile dysfunction, left lower leg neuropathy, and right lower leg neuropathy. The issues are about increased ratings for these conditions.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his right lower leg neuropathy, currently evaluated as 20 percent disabling.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to properly evaluate the appellant's right leg nerve disability, and thus remands the case for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.