The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling VA examinations to assess the veteran's service-connected PTSD and the claimed abdominal disorder, right renal calculi, left renal cyst, tinea corporis, and tinea cruris.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence is needed to determine the etiology of the veteran's claimed conditions and for a proper rating determination.
- Claimed conditions
- abdominal disorder, right renal calculi, left renal cyst, skin disorder characterized by tinea corporis and tinea cruris
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 26, 2005
- Citation
- 0501864
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,440 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0501864.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates, compensable ratings, and service connection for various conditions due to insufficient evidence of characteristic prostrating attacks for tension headaches, considerable impairment of health for GERD, a current disability for an abdominal disorder or gynecological disorder, and functional impairment for a right wrist disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate VA examination and a need for further medical opinion regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's abdominal disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran seeks service connection for a left renal cyst, claimed as a kidney condition due to the use of NSAIDs taken for his service-connected disabilities. The Board denied this claim in August 2023 and remanded it due to an error in notifying him of his right to a hearing before the AOJ.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, liver disorder, abdominal disorder, and right foot disorder due to a lack of sufficient opinion regarding the etiology of these conditions. The Veteran's service-connected depression, lumbar spine disability, and right knee disability are alleged to have contributed to obesity, which in turn caused his diagnosed conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.