The veteran's claims for increased ratings and an earlier effective date were denied. The Board found no evidence of any service connection or increase in disability related to the claimed conditions.
The deciding factor: There was no evidence of a nexus between the claimed disabilities and active duty service, nor did there appear to be any increase in severity during service or within one year after separation from service.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"lumbarization, first sacral segment, with back injury","condition_code":"20%"}, {"condition_name":"scaphoid fracture, right wrist","condition_code":"noncompensable"}, {"condition_name":"hearing loss disability","condition_code":null}, {"condition_name":"disability manifested by nerve damage to the back and left side (separate and apart from the already service-connected low back disability)","condition_code":null}, {"condition_name":"gouty arthritis","condition_code":null}, {"condition_name":"bilateral shoulder disability","condition_code":null}
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 19, 2006
- Citation
- 0601564
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.