The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased (compensable) initial evaluation for shell fragment wound residuals, scarring of the cornea, right eye due to a dense, mature cataract on the right eye that prevented assessment of vision loss from any cause other than the cataract.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of the medical evidence established that the effect of service-connected scarring on the right cornea could not be evaluated from August 2001 to the present due to a dense, mature cataract on the right eye.
- Claimed conditions
- shell fragment wound residuals, scarring of the cornea
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 28, 2006
- Citation
- 0605608
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 609 · Granted: 22% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0605608.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted TDIU with an effective date of August 21, 2020. The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is remanded for further examination and opinion.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to incomplete information and consideration of whether a TDIU should be referred for extra-schedular review. The special monthly compensation claim is also held in abeyance pending completion of these tasks.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction, to include as secondary to shell fragment wound residuals, PTSD, diabetes mellitus, and prostate cancer is being remanded due to the need for additional development of medical records.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected shell fragment wound scars of the right lower extremity with retained foreign body have been rated at 10 percent prior to October 22, 2014. The Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted for this period.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.