The veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied. The RO found that the current evaluations adequately reflected the severity of his service-connected disabilities.
The deciding factor: The RO determined that the current evaluations did not warrant an increase in any of the service-connected conditions listed.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Bilateral Hearing Loss","current_status":"Manifested by average pure tone thresholds at 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz of 35 decibels in the right ear and 39 decibels in the left ear. Speech recognition ability 96 percent correct in the right ear and 80 percent correct in the left ear."}, {"condition_name":"Degenerative Arthritis of the Left Knee","current_status":"Manifested by pain, crepitus and degenerative changes, with normal range of motion. Instability of the knee is not shown."}, {"condition_name":"Residuals of an Arthroscopy of the Right Knee with Degenerative Arthritis","current_status":"Manifested by inability to extend the knee beyond 10 degrees and limitation of extension to 120 degrees, crepitus, effusion, muscle atrophy, pain, a limp, and occasional giving out of the knee. There is slight instability and slight limitation of motion."}, {"condition_name":"Degenerative Disc Disease of the Cervical Spine","current_status":"Manifested by degenerative joint disease on X-ray evaluation, without significant limitation of motion or neurologic impairment."}, {"condition_name":"Lumbosacral Strain with Degenerative Disc Disease","current_status":"Manifested by IDS, without severe recurring attacks or attacks lasting four weeks over the past 12 months, limitation of backward extension and lateral bending, without limitation of forward flexion to 30 degrees or less or loss of lateral side motion and a positive Goldthwait's sign."}, {"condition_name":"Headaches","current_status":"Purely subjective manifestation of head trauma, without a diagnosis of multi-infarct dementia associated with brain trauma."}
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 16, 2006
- Citation
- 0607699
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for myasthenia gravis based on the Veteran's exposure to hazardous substances during his military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.