Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The veteran's post-concussion syndrome with headaches, organic disorder, and dysthymia is rated at 100% prior to June 23, 1999, and since then the rating has been increased to 70%. The veteran's labyrinthitis warrants a 30% disability rating. Right ear hearing loss does not warrant any compensable evaluation.,The veteran was granted a 100% disability rating for his service-connected post-concussion syndrome with headaches, organic disorder, and dysthymia prior to June 23, 1999, based on the evidence showing he was demonstrably unable to obtain or retain employment as a result of this condition. The veteran's labyrinthitis is rated at 30% since it is manifested by tinnitus, dizziness, and occasional staggering.

The deciding factor: The pre-November 1996 criteria for rating the veteran's post-concussion syndrome are more favorable to him as they result in a grant of a 100 percent disability rating. The amended criteria for rating peripheral vestibular disorder or labyrinthitis do not provide a higher rating than what is currently assigned.,The pre-June 1999 and the amended criteria for rating hearing loss disabilities are not more favorable to the veteran as his right ear hearing loss does not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation.

Claimed conditions
post-concussion syndrome, labyrinthitis, right ear hearing loss
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
100%
Decision date
April 10, 2006
Citation
0610351

Veterans Law Judge

MARJORIE A. AUER

Decisions by this judge: 3,038 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0610351.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.