The Board found that the veteran's left foot disorders were not incurred in or aggravated by his military service.
The deciding factor: The VA examination concluded that the current disabilities were not related to the injury sustained during service, and there was no evidence of continuing complaints for many years after service.
- Claimed conditions
- left foot disorders
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 20, 2006
- Citation
- 0611415
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,592 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0611415.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's claim for a higher rating for right heel fracture residuals is being remanded due to inconsistencies in the medical records and need for clarification of the precise disorder. The service connection claims for back and left foot disorders are not addressed as they were granted with separate evaluations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the veteran's claim for a VA examination to determine if he currently has any left ankle or left foot disorders, and whether these conditions are related to his service-connected right great toe arthritis or ingrown toenails.
- Dismissed
The veteran's appeal of secondary service connection for low back and left foot disorders has been withdrawn before the Board could make a decision.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.