The veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for rectal seepage secondary to shrapnel wounds is denied. The evidence does not show frequent involuntary bowel movements, and the veteran wears diapers only at night.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence of frequent involuntary bowel movements, which are required for a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 7332.
- Claimed conditions
- rectal seepage, shrapnel wounds
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- August 16, 2006
- Citation
- 0625150
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,582 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0625150.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the reopening of a claim for service connection for shrapnel wounds because new evidence did not establish a current diagnosis related to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for shrapnel wounds due to new and material evidence. The issue of service connection for hypertension is remanded as there is insufficient information on whether it is related to herbicide exposure in Vietnam.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for shrapnel wounds and unspecified skin condition on bilateral lower extremities due to lack of current diagnosis or manifestations. The case is remanded for further development, including an addendum opinion from a VA examiner.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have not rendered him unemployable or unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation for the period on appeal prior to June 1, 2009.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.