The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected bilateral high frequency hearing loss and left eye pterygium, finding no evidence of a compensable rating under applicable VA regulations.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not show any loss of vision or impairment in central visual acuity that would warrant a compensable rating for the veteran's service-connected left eye pterygium. The hearing loss evaluations were also noncompensable as they did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation based on audiometric test results.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral High Frequency Hearing Loss, Left Eye Pterygium
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 7, 2008
- Citation
- 0800593
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0800593.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for a TDIU rating as they do not preclude him from securing or following substantially gainful employment.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral high frequency hearing loss has been rated at 10 percent since October 31, 2021. The Board found that the disability is no worse than Level V in both ears and thus does not warrant a higher rating.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for residuals of left eye pterygium removal and dry eye syndrome, left eye has been granted. The Veteran is now rated at 20 percent for the former condition and 10 percent for the latter.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to an inadequate examination regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevented him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.