The veteran is seeking service connection for cold weather injuries to the feet. The Board has determined that there was exposure to extreme cold during service, but further evidence is needed to determine if his current neuropathic pain is related to this exposure.
The deciding factor: Further medical examination and opinion are required to establish a link between the veteran's current condition and in-service exposure to cold weather.
- Claimed conditions
- neuropathic pain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 15, 2008
- Citation
- 0827757
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0827757.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's appeal was denied as he did not file a timely substantive appeal following the issuance of a September 2019 Statement of the Case (SOC).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's surviving spouse is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for neuropathic pain from a left cheek cyst removal, which the Board has remanded due to inadequate medical opinion.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional development is necessary for the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, and TDIU claims due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the severity of his condition and need for aid and attendance. The SMC claim is also remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for further development regarding his claim of compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of bilateral inguinal hernia surgery, including paralysis of bilateral lower extremities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.