The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a dental disorder, as there was no evidence of a compensable dental condition or eligibility for VA outpatient treatment.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not support a finding that the Veteran had a compensable dental condition or met any criteria for VA outpatient dental treatment.
- Claimed conditions
- replaceable missing teeth
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 19, 2009
- Citation
- 0910407
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,242 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0910407.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a dental disability for compensation purposes because there was no evidence of loss of substance in the upper or lower jaw, and the Veteran had an abscess and replaceable missing teeth.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current dental disorder.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development to determine if the Veteran's right lower extremity radiculopathy, urinary incontinence, and erectile dysfunction are neurologic abnormalities associated with his service-connected lumbar spine IVDS prior to specific dates.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and examination, as well as to consider service connection for various disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.