The Veteran's claim for service connection for squamous cell carcinoma of the head is being remanded due to the need for a VA examination and additional records.
The deciding factor: The case requires further evaluation by a VA examiner to determine if the Veteran's condition may be related to his military service, including sun exposure during service in Vietnam.
- Claimed conditions
- squamous cell carcinoma of the head
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 4, 2009
- Citation
- 0946156
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0946156.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's TDIU claim is dismissed as moot because he is already receiving a 100% evaluation for his service-connected NHL, and there are no other disabilities independently rated at 60% or more. Additionally, the evidence does not show that he requires aid and attendance due to his service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection for sebaceous carcinoma of the head and squamous cell carcinoma of the head have been granted due to the PACT Act, which establishes presumptive service connection based on in-service exposure. The rating assigned has not yet been determined.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for cause of death due to lack of evidence showing a link between the Veteran's service and his disabilities that caused or contributed substantially to his death.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found no service connection for the cause of death due to a service-connected disability, and there was no evidence linking Agent Orange exposure to the veteran's cancer. The appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of death is denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.