The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for his service-connected athlete's foot with hypertrophic changes of toenails was denied, and the claim for an earlier effective date for TDIU was also denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the percentage requirements under Diagnostic Code 7806 for a higher rating.
The deciding factor: The Veteran’s service-connected athlete's foot with hypertrophic changes of toenails did not meet the percentage requirements under Diagnostic Code 7806 for a higher rating, as his disability affected less than 20% of his entire body or exposed areas and did not require systemic therapy.
- Claimed conditions
- Athlete's Foot (Tinea Pedis), Hypertrophic Changes of Toenails
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- February 21, 2012
- Citation
- 1206387
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1206387.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information regarding whether topical medications used by the Veteran are systemic therapy, which could affect his rating for athlete's foot and toenail fungus.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran's headaches are service-connected, but his athlete's foot, left hip disorder, and neck/shoulder spasms are not. The evidence is in relative equipoise for the headache claim.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.