The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a fungus skin disorder of the feet, right eye disorder, and lung disorder (to include asbestosis). The denial was based on the lack of evidence linking these conditions to service.,No VA examination or medical opinion was provided regarding the right eye disorder claim.
The deciding factor: The Veteran did not provide sufficient new and material evidence to reopen his claim for a fungus skin disorder of the feet. The preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that any current foot condition is related to service.,There was no competent medical evidence linking the right eye disorder or lung disorder (asbestosis) to service.
- Claimed conditions
- Fungus skin disorder of the feet, Right eye disorder, Lung disorder, to include asbestosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 4, 2012
- Citation
- 1230253
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1230253.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's right eye disorder is presumed to be related to in-service herbicide exposure. However, the VA examiner did not provide a sufficient opinion regarding the etiology of the condition and thus the claim must be remanded for further evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for PTSD, MDD with anxious distress, a right eye disorder, and sleep apnea are being remanded due to the need for additional evidence and medical opinions.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension, heart disorder, kidney disorder, right eye disorder, and acquired psychiatric disorder. The appeals are remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's daughter is appealing the denial of service connection for peripheral neuropathy of various extremities and a right eye disorder. The claims are being remanded to obtain additional medical opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions, particularly in relation to his service-connected small cell carcinoma and herbicide exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.