The Board denied the Veteran's claim of CUE in a February 1980 rating decision that denied service connection for his right arm and wrist disorder, finding no clear and unmistakable error.
The deciding factor: The Board determined that the correct facts as they were known at the time of the February 1980 rating decision were not before it, and that any errors in applying statutory or regulatory provisions would not have resulted in a different outcome.
- Claimed conditions
- right arm and wrist disorder
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 23, 2013
- Citation
- 1333274
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1333274.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for various conditions, including a left wrist disorder, left hip disorder, low back disorder, right arm and wrist disorder, varicose veins, surgical scars of the right leg, right leg disorder, and right knee disorder. The Veteran's claims were not supported by sufficient evidence to establish an in-service injury or disease.
- Partly granted
The Board has determined that the February 1980 rating decision denying service connection for a right arm and wrist disorder is final. The Veteran's claim of new and material evidence to reopen his nervous disorder claim was denied, but the issue of CUE in the February 1980 rating decision regarding his right arm and wrist condition has been granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination and further review of the claims file, including the September 2001 private medical record. The veteran's claim for service connection is also pending regarding a clear and unmistakable error in a February 1980 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and providing proper notice regarding secondary service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.