The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was not shown to be present during service and is not related to service.,There is no evidence that the Veteran's hypertension is secondary to his service-connected diabetes.,The Veteran does not have peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper extremities.,The Veteran does not have peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities.
The deciding factor: The VA audiologist determined that hearing loss was less likely than not related to service, as there was no threshold shift during service. The evidence did not show a current hearing loss disability under 38 C.F.R. § 3.385.,There is no evidence showing the Veteran's hypertension is secondary to his diabetes. The VA examiner found no link between the two conditions.,The VA examination report showed that the Veteran does not have peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper extremities.,The VA examination report showed that the Veteran does not have peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Hearing Loss, Hypertension, Peripheral Neuropathy of the Bilateral Upper Extremities, Peripheral Neuropathy of the Bilateral Lower Extremities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 14, 2014
- Citation
- 1410760
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1410760.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is granted as service-connected. The claims for alcohol abuse and psychiatric disorder are remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of these conditions.
- Denied
The Board denied the claim of service connection for hypertension, finding that it did not manifest during service and is not causally related to the Veteran's exposure to herbicides or service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a need for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss. The issue remains under direct service connection theory.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that there was no evidence of a nexus between his current condition and active duty service or herbicide exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.