The Board has found that further development is needed for VA to fulfill its duties mandated under the VCAA. The case is REMANDED for the following: (1) Secure complete clinical records of all treatment and evaluation from Dr. Jacobs; (2) Review the record, ensure all development sought is completed, and readjudicate the claims on appeal.
The deciding factor: Further development is needed to secure additional medical evidence and ensure compliance with prior remand instructions.
- Claimed conditions
- lower jaw disability, stomach and colon disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 28, 2015
- Citation
- 1553949
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1553949.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran's stomach and colon disability is secondary to his service-connected lower jaw disability, but needs further clarification from a medical examiner.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for further development due to incomplete service records and notification issues. The stomach and colon disability claim is also being deferred until the lower jaw disability claim is resolved.
- Granted
The Veteran's lower jaw disability and prostate cancer residuals are granted, with a rating of 20 percent for the latter. The Veteran is also entitled to service connection for his lower jaw disability.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a left lower jaw disability and stomach and colon disability, finding that the pre-existing tumor did not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection due to its rapid growth during service. Service connection was also denied for a stomach and colon disability as secondary to the jaw disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.