The Board has decided that the Veteran's stomach and colon disability is secondary to his service-connected lower jaw disability, but needs further clarification from a medical examiner.
The deciding factor: The current opinions are insufficient due to lack of explanation for why there is no causative link or aggravation between the conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- stomach and colon disability
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 26, 2023
- Citation
- 23005159
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23005159.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for further development due to incomplete service records and notification issues. The stomach and colon disability claim is also being deferred until the lower jaw disability claim is resolved.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a left lower jaw disability and stomach and colon disability, finding that the pre-existing tumor did not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection due to its rapid growth during service. Service connection was also denied for a stomach and colon disability as secondary to the jaw disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that further development is needed for VA to fulfill its duties mandated under the VCAA. The case is REMANDED for the following: (1) Secure complete clinical records of all treatment and evaluation from Dr. Jacobs; (2) Review the record, ensure all development sought is completed, and readjudicate the claims on appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered additional development to be completed, including securing private dental records and rescheduling the Veteran for a VA examination. The lower jaw disability claim will be readjudicated first, followed by the stomach and colon disability claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.