The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss, left ear hearing loss, and tinea pedis. The Veteran's left ear hearing loss is presumed to have been aggravated by his military service. Tinea pedis was not shown to be related to any disease or injury in service.,Service connection was established for the following conditions: left knee/leg disorders (claimed as arthritis of the left knee and left leg), right knee/leg disorders, bilateral foot disorders, and tinea pedis.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's left ear hearing loss is presumed to have been aggravated by his military service. Tinea pedis was not shown to be related to any disease or injury in service.,Service connection for the low back injury (claimed as arthritis of the lumbar spine) and bilateral foot disorders were established based on a finding that the Veteran's conditions are due to his service-connected right knee/leg disorders.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral hearing loss, left ear hearing loss, tinea pedis
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 4, 2017
- Citation
- 1710605
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1710605.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of bilateral hearing loss and a ruptured right ear drum was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was noted upon entry into active duty service and did not increase in severity during service. Therefore, it denied his claim for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for bilateral hearing loss, migraine headaches, and PTSD due to additional development of records and examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss claim, specifically needing an addendum opinion from a VA examiner. The Veteran will be asked to provide any missing records and former employers' information.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.