The Veteran is entitled to specially adapted housing due to multiple disabilities, including the loss or loss of use of one lower extremity together with residuals of organic disease or injury that so affect the functions of balance or propulsion as to preclude locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair. The special home adaptation grant claim is moot.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's disabilities include multiple service-connected conditions, including those affecting his lower extremities and balance, which meet the criteria for specially adapted housing.
- Claimed conditions
- posttraumatic stress disorder, diabetic nephropathy, bilateral pseudophakia and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (right eye), peripheral vascular disease of the right and left lower extremities, left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the sciatic nerve, right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the sciatic nerve (to include foot drop), coronary artery disease, status post coronary artery bypass graft, left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy involving the anterior crural nerve, right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy involving the anterior crural nerve (to include right foot drop), diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy of the right upper extremity (radial nerve, ulnar nerve, median nerve), peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity (radial nerve, ulnar nerve, median nerve), tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss disability, mediastinostomy scar
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 100%
- Decision date
- May 2, 2017
- Citation
- 1714417
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1714417.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hearing loss, tinnitus, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to incomplete medical records and need for further examination.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, arthritis, and memory loss. The decision found no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service connected. The issues of foot disability and cardiovascular disorder are remanded for additional development.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus, finding that it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran experienced tinnitus during his active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.