The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate reasons and bases in its November 2016 decision, which denied an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for TBI residuals. The Veteran's representative and VA's General Counsel agreed that the Board erred by failing to address certain evidence related to blurred vision, headaches, and a psychiatric disorder.
The deciding factor: The Board failed to adequately address evidence related to blurred vision, headaches, and a psychiatric disorder in its November 2016 decision.
- Claimed conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) residuals, Blurred vision, Headaches, including rebound and stress headaches
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 10, 2017
- Citation
- 1744941
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1744941.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA examination is inadequate and remands the case for further development, including obtaining additional medical records and providing a new opinion regarding the Veteran's eye disorder.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU due to his service-connected PTSD with TBI residuals alone, from August 18, 2016 forward, was denied as the evidence did not show that he could secure and maintain substantially gainful employment.
- Granted
The Veteran's TBI residuals are rated at 40% effective September 10, 2022. The heart disability is rated at 60%, effective April 1, 2025.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inconsistencies in the VA examination report and the need for further clarification on whether the Veteran's hyposmia is a TBI residual or related to his nasal fracture. The case will be returned for an orthopedic examination to clarify the severity of the service-connected TBI residuals.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.