The Board found that sensory polyneuropathy of the right upper extremity and bilateral lower extremities were not incurred or aggravated by active military service, nor may they be presumed to have been so incurred. The Veteran's exposure to herbicides during service is conceded.
The deciding factor: VA medical opinions did not find a causal relationship between the claimed conditions and events during military service, including presumed in-service herbicide exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- sensory polyneuropathy of the right upper extremity, sensory polyneuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 27, 2017
- Citation
- 1760505
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1760505.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA examinations and a need for further development, including an examination by a neurologist.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for sensory polyneuropathy of the right upper extremity, finding that there was no evidence to support a relationship between his current condition and in-service herbicide exposure or military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and insufficient examination. The Veteran's claim for service connection for neuropathy of the bilateral feet as secondary to his service-connected bilateral pes planus is pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA medical opinions and a need for clarification of the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed right upper extremity disorder, specifically sensory polyneuropathy. The claim will be re-adjudicated after obtaining updated treatment records and a clarifying VA medical opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.