The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA examinations and a need for further development, including an examination by a neurologist.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded because of deficiencies in previous VA examinations that did not address the Veteran's lay testimony and relevant diagnostic testing results.
- Claimed conditions
- sensory polyneuropathy of the right upper extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 20, 2022
- Citation
- 22002897
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22002897.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for sensory polyneuropathy of the right upper extremity, finding that there was no evidence to support a relationship between his current condition and in-service herbicide exposure or military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA medical opinions and a need for clarification of the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed right upper extremity disorder, specifically sensory polyneuropathy. The claim will be re-adjudicated after obtaining updated treatment records and a clarifying VA medical opinion.
- Denied
The Board found that sensory polyneuropathy of the right upper extremity and bilateral lower extremities were not incurred or aggravated by active military service, nor may they be presumed to have been so incurred. The Veteran's exposure to herbicides during service is conceded.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.