The Board has granted the Veteran's application to reopen his claim of entitlement to service connection for a right foot injury and has determined that there is at least an equipoise of evidence in favor of the Veteran's claim, finding that his current right foot condition is related to his military service.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that the Veteran's current right foot condition was caused by the foot and ankle injury sustained during service with the Army.
- Claimed conditions
- right foot metatarsal fracture, posttraumatic arthritis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 18, 2018
- Citation
- 1803319
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1803319.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has dismissed the appeal for the issue of entitlement to an initial compensable evaluation for service-connected scars, s/p metacarpal fracture due to the Veteran's withdrawal. The claim of entitlement to an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for service-connected post traumatic arthritis, s/p metacarpal fracture is remanded as there are issues with the adequacy of a previous VA examination.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and effective dates were denied. The Board found no factual basis to grant earlier effective dates.,The Veteran was granted a TDIU and DEA eligibility effective September 15, 2022.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for a right foot condition, including hallux rigidus with degenerative arthritis, based on the Veteran's credible assertions of continuous symptoms since active duty and resolving reasonable doubt in his favor.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's appeal for a rating higher than 10% for his right wrist condition. The decision was based on the lack of evidence showing ankylosis or its functional equivalent.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.