The Veteran's service connection claim for non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the right hip and its residuals is denied. The Board finds that there is no evidence linking his current condition to his military service, specifically an in-service motor vehicle accident. However, the Veteran was granted a TDIU prior to March 12, 2014 due to his service-connected disabilities.
The deciding factor: The medical expert's opinion found no direct link between the Veteran's in-service injury and his current NHL diagnosis, as well as no evidence of tropism for the hip area. The Board considered conflicting opinions but ultimately sided with the expert's conclusion that the Veteran's right hip trauma was unlikely to have caused his NHL.
- Claimed conditions
- non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the right hip, residuals thereof
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 19, 2018
- Citation
- 1803762
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1803762.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a need for a medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's stroke and its residuals are related to his service in Southwest Asia, given the PACT Act provisions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information about the Veteran's service and a need for an examination to determine if his current ingrown toenail disability is related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted the appellant's claim for service connection for gastric ulcers and their residuals as secondary to his service-connected GERD. The decision concludes that the current gastric ulcers are caused by and aggravated by his service-connected GERD.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for prostate cancer and its residuals is being remanded due to the need for a TERA examination, as well as the need to obtain additional VA and private treatment records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.