The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate VA examination and incomplete records. The appellant seeks service connection for cavernous hemangioma with brain hemorrhage, which she claims is related to her military service. The examiner's opinion was not adequate as it did not address the appellant’s statements about a head injury during basic training.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the VA examination and opinion were inadequate due to lack of explanation for the speculative nature of the opinion and failure to consider the appellant's statements regarding her head injury during service.
- Claimed conditions
- cavernous hemangioma with brain hemorrhage
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 12, 2018
- Citation
- 18110509
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18110509.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the complexity of the matter and the need for an independent medical opinion from a Neurologist specializing in cavernous hemangioma malformations.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for cavernous hemangioma with brain hemorrhage, finding that there was no evidence to support a link between the condition and her active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate VA examination and incomplete records. The appellant seeks service connection for cavernous hemangioma with brain hemorrhage, which she claims is related to her military service. The examiner's opinion was not adequate as it did not address the appellant’s statements about a head injury during basic training. The Board also noted that SSA records were not obtained.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination, clarification of the appellant's service dates and nature, and additional development related to her claim for service connection for cavernous hemangioma with brain hemorrhage.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.