The Board has decided to remand the case due to the complexity of the matter and the need for an independent medical opinion from a Neurologist specializing in cavernous hemangioma malformations.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the complexities of the case, specifically the need for clarification regarding the etiology of the Veteran's claimed disability.
- Claimed conditions
- cavernous hemangioma with brain hemorrhage
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 12, 2020
- Citation
- 20072815
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,077 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20072815.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for cavernous hemangioma with brain hemorrhage, finding that there was no evidence to support a link between the condition and her active duty service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate VA examination and incomplete records. The appellant seeks service connection for cavernous hemangioma with brain hemorrhage, which she claims is related to her military service. The examiner's opinion was not adequate as it did not address the appellant’s statements about a head injury during basic training.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate VA examination and incomplete records. The appellant seeks service connection for cavernous hemangioma with brain hemorrhage, which she claims is related to her military service. The examiner's opinion was not adequate as it did not address the appellant’s statements about a head injury during basic training. The Board also noted that SSA records were not obtained.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination, clarification of the appellant's service dates and nature, and additional development related to her claim for service connection for cavernous hemangioma with brain hemorrhage.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.