Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for a bilateral hearing loss disability was denied as there is no evidence of a current diagnosis under VA regulation.,Claims for increased ratings for cervical spine and lumbar spine disabilities were remanded due to insufficient medical evidence or lack of clear and unmistakable error (CUE).,Service connection claims for digestive disorder, joint pain, skin condition, traumatic brain injury, and right great toe bunionectomy residuals were also remanded.,The Veteran withdrew his claim for a disability rating in excess of 10 percent for tinnitus and for a compensable disability rating for scars (claimed as neck fusion surgical scar, bunionectomy scar).

The deciding factor: There is no current diagnosis of bilateral hearing loss disability under VA regulation.,Insufficient medical evidence or lack of clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in the original decision regarding increased ratings for cervical spine and lumbar spine disabilities.,Lack of sufficient medical evidence to establish service connection for digestive disorder, joint pain, skin condition, traumatic brain injury, and right great toe bunionectomy residuals.,The Veteran withdrew his claims for a disability rating in excess of 10 percent for tinnitus and for a compensable disability rating for scars (claimed as neck fusion surgical scar).

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss disability, cervical spine disability, lumbar spine disability, right knee chondromalacia patella with degenerative joint disease (a right knee disability), digestive disorder (to include irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), lactose intolerance, and wheat intolerance), joint pain (due to exposure to toxins in the Southwest Asia Theater of Operations), skin condition of trunk of the body, traumatic brain injury (TBI) with short-term memory loss and headaches
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 8, 2018
Citation
18124674

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18124674.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.