Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss has been reopened, but the evidence does not meet the criteria to establish a current disability.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for COPD has been reopened, but the evidence does not meet the criteria to establish a current disability.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, bilateral knee disorders, and lumbosacral spine disorder have all been reopened. The additional evidence raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating these claims.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea has been remanded due to the need for a VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been remanded due to the need for a VA examination.

The deciding factor: No current evidence of bilateral hearing loss by VA criteria was provided, despite complaints and treatment in service.,No current evidence of COPD was provided, despite complaints and treatment in service.,New evidence showed current symptoms of tinnitus, bilateral knee disorders, and lumbosacral spine disorder. However, no medical nexus to service connection could be established.,The Veteran's sleep apnea has not been evaluated by VA due to the need for an examination.,The Veteran's TBI residuals have not been evaluated by VA due to the need for an examination.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, chronic respiratory disorder (COPD), tinnitus, bilateral knee disability, lumbosacral spine disorder
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 17, 2018
Citation
18127601

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18127601.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.