Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's tinnitus is currently rated at 10 percent and no higher, as it does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.,Service connection has been granted for major depressive disorder secondary to service-connected PTSD.,Joint pain (bilateral knee osteoarthritis), neck disorder (cervical spine arthritis), and back disorder (lumbar spine arthritis) have not met the criteria for service connection as they are not shown to be related to service or within one year of separation from service.,Left ankle disorder, vision disorder (refractive error of the eye), bilateral hearing loss, shortness of breath, and sleep disorder have not been established as service-connected due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to service.,Heart disorder has not met the criteria for service connection.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's tinnitus is already at its maximum schedular rating (10 percent), so no higher rating can be granted.,Major depressive disorder secondary to PTSD was established as a result of VA treatment records showing symptoms attributed to both conditions.,There is insufficient evidence linking the current knee, neck, and back disorders to service. The Veteran's service records do not show any in-service disease or injury involving these areas, nor are there lay statements of continuity of symptomatology since service.,Bilateral hearing loss, shortness of breath, and sleep disorder have no established link to service based on the evidence provided.,Heart disorder has not been shown to be related to service.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, major depressive disorder, joint pain (bilateral knee osteoarthritis), neck disorder (cervical spine arthritis), back disorder (lumbar spine arthritis), left ankle disorder, vision disorder (refractive error of the eye), bilateral hearing loss, shortness of breath, sleep disorder, heart disorder
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 31, 2018
Citation
18131164

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18131164.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.