Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability is denied as there is no evidence of in-service noise exposure or a link to service.,The Veteran's right and left knee replacements are remanded due to the absence of continuity of symptomatology from service and lack of explanation regarding claimed in-service injuries.,The Veteran's hypertension, chronic renal disease, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia are remanded as they may be related to his multiple myeloma. The claims for these conditions will be deferred pending further development.,The Veteran's multiple myeloma is remanded due to the absence of a dose estimate from VA’s Under Secretary for Health regarding ionizing radiation exposure during service.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence or claim that the Veteran was diagnosed with a hearing loss disability within one year of service, and there is no objective evidence of noise-induced auditory injury prior to separation from service.,The Veteran has not provided any explanation regarding the purported in-service injuries and the relationship to his post-service bilateral knee replacements. Further development is required.,The claims for hypertension, chronic renal disease, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia are remanded as they may be related to the Veteran's multiple myeloma. The claims will be deferred pending further development.,The Veteran’s radiation exposure during service was not due to atmospheric nuclear weapons test participation or the occupation of Hiroshima or Nagasaki, so a dose estimate must be obtained from VA’s Under Secretary for Health.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss disability, right knee replacement, left knee replacement, hypertension, chronic renal disease, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 16, 2018
Citation
18142757

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18142757.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.