Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service-connected.,Bilateral hearing loss disability has not been established as a current disability for VA purposes.,High cholesterol is not considered a disability for which service connection can be granted.,Hypertension and prostate disorder are not found to have begun during active service or be related to an in-service injury, event, or disease.,Service connection for prostate disorder is denied.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's tinnitus was etiologically related to his military noise exposure. The VA examiner confirmed this finding and provided a medical opinion supporting the claim.,There is no evidence of hearing loss disability during service or within one year post-service, thus not meeting the criteria for presumptive service connection under 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(a).,High cholesterol is considered a lab finding and not a chronic disability warranting VA compensation.,The Veteran's hypertension was first diagnosed more than two years after his discharge from active duty, and did not manifest to a compensable degree within the one-year presumptive period following his separation. Additionally, there is no evidence of an in-service injury or disease that could be related to these conditions.,There is insufficient evidence to establish service connection for prostate disorder as it was first diagnosed many years after discharge from active duty.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss disability, high cholesterol, hypertension, prostate disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 8, 2018
Citation
18148864

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18148864.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.